Due to a “credibility gap”, drugmakers are now being moved to make reports on clinical research results more transparent, whether the results are good or bad. According to an article on mednews.com by Kevin B. O’Reilly, there have been 10 approved recommendations on improving transparency, including, among others, making all results public, disclosing who is making what writing contributions, and providing complete information on trial protocol and statistical methods used. Although this incentive is being applauded, the real question is whether the pharmaceutical companies will actually do it. To read more on this subject, check out the article here.
Single IRB – A Guide to the Common Rule sIRB Mandate
The sIRB requirement is active. Is your study affected?
Clinical Research Accelerated
You need high quality, timely board reviews so that you can get your study in the clinic.
Recent Posts
Pearl IRB 2024 Year-End Schedule
Snowball Sampling: Is it ethical to pay your study subjects to recruit participants on your behalf?
Improving Exempt Submissions: 7 Tips to Reduce Revision Requests
Common Rule Exceptions to the Use of a Single IRB for Multi-site Research Ends After May 11, 2023
Pearl IRB 2022 Year-End Schedule