The final FDA guidance entitled “Guidance for Industry Oversight of Clinical Investigations —A Risk-Based Approach to Monitoring,” issued early August is similar to the draft guidance published in 2011. FDA encourages risk based remote monitoring, electronic tracking methods, and also defines that if a CRO is responsible for monitoring a study, the Sponsor should still review the CRO to ensure they are meeting regulatory and contract requirements. Zachary Brenna from outsourcingpharma.com notes in a recent article that this approach may be most appropriate for Phase II and IV trials, and, reviews some of the rationale as to why Sponsors may be slow to adopt this with pivotal registration trials. To read Brenna’s article, click here and to view FDA’s final guidance, click here. Need assistance with your clinical trial? Contact us at contact@pearlpathways.com for assistance with IRB reviews, protocol writing, development and execution of risk based monitoring plans, CRO audits, and more.
Single IRB – A Guide to the Common Rule sIRB Mandate
The sIRB requirement is active. Is your study affected?
Clinical Research Accelerated
You need high quality, timely board reviews so that you can get your study in the clinic.
Recent Posts
Pearl IRB 2024 Year-End Schedule
Snowball Sampling: Is it ethical to pay your study subjects to recruit participants on your behalf?
Improving Exempt Submissions: 7 Tips to Reduce Revision Requests
Common Rule Exceptions to the Use of a Single IRB for Multi-site Research Ends After May 11, 2023
Pearl IRB 2022 Year-End Schedule