It comes back to matching skill sets for increased efficiency. Odds are the Board chair was chosen, or elected, based on their leadership skills. Or, was this person chosen based on their keen ability to organize documentation per standard procedures to ensure compliance and reduce error rate? The Chair role and Administrator role are very different tasks requiring different skill sets. While perusing the warning letters to IRBs, one finds that the gaps are the ability to operate consistently in compliance with Federal and State regulations. The devil is in the details and that is where the Administrator lives; not the Chair. At Pearl IRB the Administration role is specifically separate from the Chair role to ensure efficient, ethical reviews.
Single IRB – A Guide to the Common Rule sIRB Mandate
The sIRB requirement is active. Is your study affected?
Clinical Research Accelerated
You need high quality, timely board reviews so that you can get your study in the clinic.
Recent Posts
Chevron, Natural Resources Defense Council, Loper Bright Enterprises, Raimondo, et al.
5 Common Errors in the Informed Consent Process
Pearl IRB 2024 Year-End Schedule
Snowball Sampling: Is it ethical to pay your study subjects to recruit participants on your behalf?
Improving Exempt Submissions: 7 Tips to Reduce Revision Requests