Clinical trial sponsors and contract research organizations (CRO) are working together to find a balance between the level of micromanagement and the quality of trials. Outsourcing-Pharma.com’s Zachary Brennan reports that recent studies found that only 41% of sponsors felt they could achieve quality trials without increased oversight, however, sponsors still want less micromanagement. Another tension in the relationship between CROs and sponsors is the amount of risk involved. Christopher Hilton, vice president of development and clinical alliance manager at Pfizer comments, “at the end of the day, CROs talk about wanting skin in the game and risk-sharing, but if we screw up at Pfizer and lose $2 billion, they aren’t going to share in that risk.” Acting division director of good clinical compliance for the US FDA, Anne Meeker-O’Connell, believe that clarity between the two sides can solve most issues. To read the full perspective click here.
Single IRB – A Guide to the Common Rule sIRB Mandate
The sIRB requirement is active. Is your study affected?
Clinical Research Accelerated
You need high quality, timely board reviews so that you can get your study in the clinic.
Recent Posts
Pearl IRB 2024 Year-End Schedule
Snowball Sampling: Is it ethical to pay your study subjects to recruit participants on your behalf?
Improving Exempt Submissions: 7 Tips to Reduce Revision Requests
Common Rule Exceptions to the Use of a Single IRB for Multi-site Research Ends After May 11, 2023
Pearl IRB 2022 Year-End Schedule