A new report from PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) found that the use of a risk-based algorithm to monitor clinical studies reduced the deployment of research associates and targeted more high-risk patients and sites. Although CROs and sponsors have been hesitant to use more risk based approaches, the PwC report estimates that risk-based monitoring can save between 15% and 20% in study portfolio cost. There is a broad range of risk based monitoring available and the FDA guidance from late 2011, entitled “Oversight of Clinical Investigations – A Risk Based Approach to Monitoring” suggested that sponsors rely less on on-site monitoring and use a more centralized approach. To read the full article from outsourcing-pharma.com, click here. Contact us at 317-899-9341 to help with your clinical trial monitoring.
Single IRB – A Guide to the Common Rule sIRB Mandate
The sIRB requirement is active. Is your study affected?
Clinical Research Accelerated
You need high quality, timely board reviews so that you can get your study in the clinic.
Recent Posts
Pearl IRB 2024 Year-End Schedule
Snowball Sampling: Is it ethical to pay your study subjects to recruit participants on your behalf?
Improving Exempt Submissions: 7 Tips to Reduce Revision Requests
Common Rule Exceptions to the Use of a Single IRB for Multi-site Research Ends After May 11, 2023
Pearl IRB 2022 Year-End Schedule