On September 10, 2013, the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development released a report concerning the leading causes of failures in drug development. Based on a study of products that entered clinical development from 2000 through 2009, the study found that Phase I failures were linked to commercial reasons almost 41% of the time, while the bulk of Phase II failures could be explained by efficacy issues just over 50% of the time. This study’s results help researchers because, “It is in the interest of drug developers to have new products fail earlier, rather than later, in development, as earlier terminations avoid the costs of larger, more complex studies.” as Joseph A. DiMasi, Tufts CSDD director of economic analysis, explains. To view the full Tufts CSDD report click here.
Single IRB – A Guide to the Common Rule sIRB Mandate
The sIRB requirement is active. Is your study affected?
Clinical Research Accelerated
You need high quality, timely board reviews so that you can get your study in the clinic.
Recent Posts
Pearl IRB 2024 Year-End Schedule
Snowball Sampling: Is it ethical to pay your study subjects to recruit participants on your behalf?
Improving Exempt Submissions: 7 Tips to Reduce Revision Requests
Common Rule Exceptions to the Use of a Single IRB for Multi-site Research Ends After May 11, 2023
Pearl IRB 2022 Year-End Schedule